Did The Horn Honk? The Modern Revolution in Horn Design

What is “Honk” Sound

The term “honk” in audio is often associated with an undesirable coloration that gives a nasal or hollow character to the sound. This phenomenon can arise from several combined sources:

History

At the beginning of the audio industry, amplifiers were unable to deliver significant power. Early tube amplifiers could only produce a few watts:

        tube amp  
        tube amp  

To compensate for this limitation, the audio industry relied on high-efficiency acoustic loading—at the expense of everything else. This focus on maximizing efficiency came with severe trade-offs in linearity, directivity control, and time-domain performance. A prime example is the Western Electric 15A, introduced in the 1920s:

        tube amp  
        tube amp  
This approach led to significant compromises, including poor directivity control, resonant artifacts, and time-domain distortions.

These issues caused midrange narrowing, midrange narrowing and beaming, and ultimately, the characteristic “honk” sound.

Over time, this early limitation wrongly became a defining trait of all horn-loaded systems, giving rise to a persistent and unfounded cliché. Despite decades of advancements in horn design, many still associate horns with this outdated flaw, even though modern designs have completely eliminated the causes of “honk.”

How Audio Solved It

The issues that caused the “honk” sound a century ago have been progressively eliminated thanks to technological advancements. Key improvements include:

The Role of Crossover Optimization and Directivity Matching

A common misconception is that midrange crossovers inherently degrade sound quality.

However, modern design techniques ensure that, when properly implemented, crossovers pose no issue. By precisely controlling:

Properly implemented systems achieve seamless transitions between drivers without introducing audible artifacts.

One crucial aspect often forgotten is directivity matching at the crossover point. If the directivity patterns of adjacent drivers do not align properly, this can lead to a perceived “empty midrange,” where energy is either lost off-axis or becomes accidented.

By carefully designing the crossover region to maintain a consistent radiation pattern, we ensure a smooth and natural transition across the frequency spectrum.

Today’s tools, such as VituixCAD and REW, allow for advanced crossover simulation, measurements and optimization of crossover design including directivity match, ensuring perfect integration between components. Thanks to these technologies, crossover points in the midrange are no longer a limitation but rather an integral part of achieving optimal performance.

Conclusion

The so-called “honk” sound was a byproduct of early horn-loaded systems, where efficiency was prioritized over all other design considerations due to amplifier power limitations. These compromises led to resonance issues, poor directivity control, and time-domain distortions that reinforced the negative perception of horns.

However, modern advancements in amplification, simulation, DSP, horn geometry, and compression driver technology have completely eliminated the root causes of “honk”. Today, properly designed horn-loaded systems benefit from optimized throat loading, controlled directivity, and seamless crossover transitions. Software like VituixCAD ensures precise phase alignment, time correction, and directivity matching in crossovers, making them transparent and free of artifacts.

In short, “honk” is a relic of the past, a problem solved long ago. Properly implemented horn designs now offer high efficiency, controlled dispersion, and accurate sound reproduction without compromise.

The outdated cliché of honky horns persists, but the reality is that modern constant directivity horn systems, when properly designed with loading capacity as we do, achieve unmatched linearity, phase coherence and neutrality, setting the benchmark for high-performance loudspeaker design.

copyright